Parabéns, JY. Suas contribuições ao campo são de fato muito relevantes,
Um abraço
Décio

________________________

Décio Krause
Departamento de Filosofia
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
www.cfh.ufsc.br/~dkrause
________________________





Em 23/03/2014, à(s) 12:01, jean-yves beziau <[email protected]> escreveu:

> Acabou de ser publicado na Synthese meu artigo
> The Relativity and Universality of Logic
> http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-014-0419-0
> 
> Este artigo e relacionada a uma palestra que apresentei em 2012 em Budapest
> convidado para participar do congresso comemorando os 70 anos do Istvan
> Németi
> http://www.renyi.hu/conferences/nemeti70/index.html
> aqui algumas fotos do evento
> https://plus.google.com/photos/101585084097816999360/albums/5789950721172732561
> 
> Neste artigo eu explico em particular como e porque estou usando a
> expressao *universal logic*
> e faz algumas analises criticas de expressoes tais que
> *logical pluralism*, "non-classical logics" , *cognitives sciences",
> 
> Vam ai alguns extratos:
> 
> "The semantic network of *universal* does not include only the *universe*,
> but also *university*,
> *universal gravitation*, *universal quantifier*, *universal declaration of
> human
> right*, *universal salvation*. This is a very powerful word, having
> religious, political,
> physical and logical dimensions, that should be used carefully"
> 
> "Logical pluralism promotes plurality rather than unity. It is in the line
> with putting an “s” everywhere; physics, mathematics, religions, logics."
> 
> "The non-classical logicians are in fact most of the time roaming around
> the house
> of classical logic, this is their reference point. Some want to burn the
> old house and
> build a brand new one. Others want to improve it, extending it with many
> operators:
> modalities, branching quantifiers, etc. Some guys just construct their own
> little house
> close by."
> 
> "Cognitive science is maybe the highest
> tentative of interdisciplinarity and at least it succeeded in unifying
> around an
> idea, a word. But behind the word there is a lot of
> confusion/heterogeneity."
> 
> The Relativity and Universality of Logic
> 1. Two questions and a double meaning
> 2. The logical relativity of logic
> 2.1. Two extreme positions
> 2.2. Science in transformation
> 2.3. Logic in transformation
> 3. The road to Logica Universalis
> 3.1. Universal logic vs Universal Logic
> 3.2. Universal algebra and Universal logic
> 3.3. Mathesis Universalis and Logica Universalis
> 4. Three roads to nowhere?
> 4.1. The fashion of logical pluralism
> 4.2. The heresy of non-classical logics
> 4.3. The mayonnaise of cognitive science
> _______________________________________________
> Logica-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l

_______________________________________________
Logica-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l

Responder a