Could you explain the difference between a 'true' LoCo and a [presumably] 'false' LoCo?
My understanding is that groups of people were given LoCo status were all LoCo groups to the Ubuntu Community. Are you saying here that they are, indeed, looked at differently by the council? On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Hi, Dmitry, > > This will be the subject of an upcoming LEP / RFC Mail, let's just > focus on "true" LoCos, first > > All the best, > Paul > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Dmitry Agafonov > <agafonovdmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What about language-based loco teams? > > > > -- > > Dmitry Agafonov ~ http://agafonov.pp.ru/ > > > > -- > > loco-contacts mailing list > > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > > > > > > -- > All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. > > #define sizeof(x) rand() > :wq > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts -- Chuck Frain GPG Key: B2420431 http://www.chuckfrain.net -- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
