On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 08:54 +0100, Matthew East wrote:

> Again, agreed - this may be a linguistic thing, but you're confusing a
> logo with a header. All of those sites use the Ubuntu _logo_. Sure, they
> customise the header of the page, as is natural, but the logo is wholly
> identical.
> 
> As far as I can see that is not the case with the proposed logos so far.

My reasoning was outlined in a previous email - I would like to have a
logo that identifies the LoCo project, for use in various places. This
logo needs to be heavily based around the Ubuntu logo, and the proposed
one is.

I don't see "we don't need a logo here because other teams don't have
one as an argument". I think there are many, and valid places where a
graphical representation of the general LoCo project would be useful.

        Jono

-- 
Jono Bacon
Ubuntu Community Manager
jono(at)ubuntu(dot)com
www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org


-- 
loco-contacts mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts

Reply via email to