On Feb 5, 2008 2:40 PM, Dale Johannesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> With or without... > > > > Right, I agree. The f.e. should do this unconditionally, > > > > -Chris > > OK, maybe so. The trouble is people use those builtins that are > linked to a > particular instruction, and expect to get that instruction and nothing > else. > But I don't have much sympathy for those people:) > That's when we point them to the docs on inline ASM ;-)
-bw _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
