On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >> Hi Dale, >> >> Looks like there is some desynchronization here now: >> >>> + } else if (TREE_CODE(Type) == INTEGER_TYPE || \ >>> + TREE_CODE(Type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE) { \ >> Shouldn't be POINTER_TYPE here also? >> >>> + if (TREE_CODE(ArgTy) == INTEGER_TYPE || TREE_CODE(ArgTy) == >>> POINTER_TYPE || >>> + TREE_CODE(ArgTy) == REAL_TYPE) >> And ENUMERAL_TYPE here? > > Oops, I meant POINTER throughout, as it was before. Will fix, thanks.
Fixed. There is something wrong with the dependencies. I had to remove llvm-types.o to get it to recompile. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits