On Feb 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Looks like there is some desynchronization here now:
>
>> + } else if (TREE_CODE(Type) == INTEGER_TYPE || \
>> + TREE_CODE(Type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE) { \
> Shouldn't be POINTER_TYPE here also?
>
>> + if (TREE_CODE(ArgTy) == INTEGER_TYPE || TREE_CODE(ArgTy) ==
>> POINTER_TYPE ||
>> + TREE_CODE(ArgTy) == REAL_TYPE)
> And ENUMERAL_TYPE here?
Oops, I meant POINTER throughout, as it was before. Will fix, thanks.
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
