On Dec 12, 2007, at 1:32 AM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> Making the address space default to zero is convenient, but >> dangerous. This means that xforms that play with pointers need to be >> very careful to propagate this info in some cases. Do you think this >> is the best way to go? Do many clients of PointerType::get need to >> be aware of addr spaces? > > I'm going to add a new method for getting a pointer type > 'PointerType::getUnqual()' that only takes an element type, the > standard 'PointerType::get()' will take both an element type and > address space with no default values. This should at least make it > explicit in the code which clients do not pass in an address space. > There are currently many clients, so this should help make the work > incremental.
Excellent idea, -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
