On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi Anton, > >>> llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libobjc/ >> I expect, that nobody will use objc fe on non-darwin, but anyway - >> why >> removing libobjc (and not just excluding from build)? >> > Good question. Right now, I'm just trying to sync our tree with what's > in Apple GCC 4.2's TOT. My guess is that if we don't remove some > directories, we will probably run into situations where the Makefiles > will start to build then even though we told them not to. > > I really don't have a strong opinions. For instance, we could keep it > in the repository and then ignore it like we do libstdc++-v3 (which is > also removed in their TOT). > > Comments?
Honestly I'd think you'd want to keep them for other OS's, the darwin libstdc++ avoidance should be platform specific and linux will want the directories to build. -eric _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
