On Aug 1, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > >>>> I do want to support static codegen for JIT. If non-JIT mode >>>> silently >>>> change it to dynamic-no-pic, then we can't emulate with llc. >>>> >>>> An alternative is to define a code model that is somewhere between >>>> small and medium. It's only used by Mac OS / static though. Not >>>> sure >>>> if that's cleaner? >>> >>> Okay, instead of checking for isTargetDarwin() in this low-level >>> place, what do you think of adding a new subtarget field, which is >>> only set on darwin, and checking that instead? The idea of doing >>> this is that instead of checking isTargetDarwin(), you would check >>> ST- >>>> hasNoSmallModel() or something, which is more obvious to the reader >>> what is going on. >> >> A subtarget field is an acceptable compromise. However, it's not >> hasNoSmallModel(). We are still using small code model (i.e. >> everything must fit within 4G). It's just the lower 4G is not >> available. > > Ah, so everything fits in "some" 4g, but just not the "low" 4g?
Yep. Evan > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
