On Aug 1, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: >>> I do want to support static codegen for JIT. If non-JIT mode >>> silently >>> change it to dynamic-no-pic, then we can't emulate with llc. >>> >>> An alternative is to define a code model that is somewhere between >>> small and medium. It's only used by Mac OS / static though. Not sure >>> if that's cleaner? >> >> Okay, instead of checking for isTargetDarwin() in this low-level >> place, what do you think of adding a new subtarget field, which is >> only set on darwin, and checking that instead? The idea of doing >> this is that instead of checking isTargetDarwin(), you would check >> ST- >>> hasNoSmallModel() or something, which is more obvious to the reader >> what is going on. > > A subtarget field is an acceptable compromise. However, it's not > hasNoSmallModel(). We are still using small code model (i.e. > everything must fit within 4G). It's just the lower 4G is not > available.
Ah, so everything fits in "some" 4g, but just not the "low" 4g? -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
