On Jul 8, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 19:27 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> >> I'm not talking about getting llvm-top going. > > It is going. I can successfully build llvm and hlvm by checking out > llvm-top and just doing: > > make build MODULE=hlvm > > Although I can't test hlvm because the repository doesn't have llvm- > gcc > yet.
Again, I'm *not* talking about llvm-top. > >> That is orthogonal >> from getting the basic web site restored to operational. > > Are we talking about llvm-gcc here or the website ? If the web site, > how's that going? When do you expect to have it working? No, neither. >> I'd like to >> be able to check out "test-suite" as projects/test-suite and have >> that "just work" for example. > > That's a strange request. If you check it out and put it in > projects/llvm-test it works just fine. When we build from llvm-top it > will check it out and put it in a test-suite directory. Again, I > don't > see why this is a road block. I just want the basic instructions on the web site to be *correct*, and for all the previous capabilities of the llvm project to be working. e.g., links to the command guide being broken are very bad. -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
