On Jul 8, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:57 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Jul 7, 2007, at 12:09 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:51 -0500, David A. Greene wrote: >>>> I posted this patch a while back but nothing happened with it. >>>> llvm users who >>>> configure with --enable-expensive-checks are currently unable to >>>> build >>>> llvm-gcc without this patch. autoconf must be re-run after >>>> applying it. >>>> >>>> Who is resposible for applying patches to llvm-gcc? >>> >>> More to the point, when is the llvm-gcc code going to migrate to the >>> llvm.org repository ? >> >> After PR1535 is fixed (the current set of svn conversion bugs). > > Well, there's some chicken-egg issues there. You can't get test- > suite to > build without llvm-gcc and the way llvm-top works, it expects llvm-gcc > to be in the repository. So, I can't test that part without it in the > repository. Same thing for hlvm.
I'm not talking about getting llvm-top going. That is orthogonal from getting the basic web site restored to operational. I'd like to be able to check out "test-suite" as projects/test-suite and have that "just work" for example. -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
