Yes, it looks good. I can deal with LDRcp and friends later. Thanks.
Evan On Jun 18, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: >> We can eliminate LDRcp, that's fine. >> >> However, I still don't like the separate hook and targetinstrinfo >> bit. Dan, can you have just a single isTriviallyReMaterializable hook >> that encompass all these? > > What do you think about the attached patch? It's not tested yet, > but it > shows what I think you're asking for. I left LDRcp in, but that can > be fixed. > > Dan > > -- > Dan Gohman, Cray Inc. > <patch> > _______________________________________________ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
