On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 10:11 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Chris, > > > > I have converted ConstantRange to use APInt internally. This > > simplified > > it and got rid of some of the helper functions inside ConstantRange > > (because they have equivalents in APInt). Now I'm thinking that > > ConstantRange should completely avoid the use of ConstantInt in its > > API > > and replace all such uses with APInt. This would mean that the class > > could be implemented in lib/Support instead of lib/Analysis because it > > would no longer depend on lib/VMCore. > > > > Is this a desirable change? > > Very desirable! > > > Or, do you want the interface to still work > > with ConstantInt? > > No need, the clients of ConstantRange can do the xlation.
Okay, I will make it so in increments. > > -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
