On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > Chris, > > I have converted ConstantRange to use APInt internally. This > simplified > it and got rid of some of the helper functions inside ConstantRange > (because they have equivalents in APInt). Now I'm thinking that > ConstantRange should completely avoid the use of ConstantInt in its > API > and replace all such uses with APInt. This would mean that the class > could be implemented in lib/Support instead of lib/Analysis because it > would no longer depend on lib/VMCore. > > Is this a desirable change?
Very desirable! > Or, do you want the interface to still work > with ConstantInt? No need, the clients of ConstantRange can do the xlation. -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
