mikulas-patocka wrote: > > Seems like we are still waiting for confirmation on this one? > > My understanding from @mikulas-patocka in #106846 is that there was no > regression on current main after merging over a week ago, so I think we > should be good to go. > > Not sure what the remaining time-line is, but it would be good to make sure > the regression is fixed in the release.
There was a regression - the pointless move of %r14 to %r15 and back and loading %rsi from the stack that I mentioned in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/106846 is actually a regression that was recently added to git. With older clang-22 from Debian Sid (version 1:22~++20250731080150+be449d6b6587-1~exp1), these pointless instructions are not generated. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151680 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
