fhahn wrote: > I expect a double-check for #106846 before the merge. Sorry I'm too busy to > do this.
Sounds good! My understanding from @mikulas-patocka response in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/106846 is that there is that the current patch didn't regress their use case. For the reproducer shared there I am also not seeing any regression on X86 skylake (the only X86 system I have access to) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151680 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
