================
@@ -183,99 +347,69 @@ getComponentObject(std::optional<Object> object,
return getComponentObject(baseObj.value(), semaCtx);
}
-static void
-generateMemberPlacementIndices(const Object &object,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<int> &indices,
- semantics::SemanticsContext &semaCtx) {
+void generateMemberPlacementIndices(const Object &object,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<int64_t> &indices,
----------------
agozillon wrote:
I believe as I opted to utilise an I64 array attribute to contain the member
indices as it had better utility/support/ease of use from what I could see when
moving over to the new member index style.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111192
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
