agozillon wrote: > > > You could do the renaming of the pass as an NFC PR so it would make the > > > non NFC changes more obvious to spot at. Not necessary to do it for this > > > time but next time it would be nice. > > > > > > I'm very sorry about that! I didn't realise it would be a problem, but I > > will keep it in mind for the future for any renaming + change sets I aim to > > upstream. Thank you for bringing it up. > > Not an issue at all. It's just simpler to look at small PRs :-)
Yes, I am sorry about that, I'd like to make it as easy as possible to review for you all as I know it's not an easy task and I greatly appreciate the effort you all put in, so I will most definitely keep it mind in the future! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82853 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
