clementval wrote: > > You could do the renaming of the pass as an NFC PR so it would make the non > > NFC changes more obvious to spot at. Not necessary to do it for this time > > but next time it would be nice. > > I'm very sorry about that! I didn't realise it would be a problem, but I will > keep it in mind for the future for any renaming + change sets I aim to > upstream. Thank you for bringing it up.
Not an issue at all. It's just simpler to look at small PRs :-) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82853 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
