On 19 September 2016 at 16:18, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > De-inventing the wheel - We should use more code from LLVM, and delete code > in LLDB where LLVM provides a solution.
Another example of duplicated code is the debug info parsing (LLDB source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF vs LLVM lib/DebugInfo/DWARF). I took a look at trying to rationalize the two when I first started working with LLDB and it looked like a large task then, and they've only continued to diverge. However, diffs between the two trees are now at least not cluttered with whitespace and formatting differences. I'll try to take another look at these. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
