On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:37 PM Greg Clayton <gclay...@apple.com> wrote:
> > > Just thinking out loud here, but one possibility is to have multiple > pools. One which is ref counted and one which isn't. If you need > something to live forever, vend it from the non-ref-counted pool. > Otherwise vend it from the ref counted pool. > > Again, since we already are using LLVM under the hood here, I would hope > to avoid changes if possible. > > Right, but we aren't specifically using the llvm::StringPool class which ref counts. idk, maybe there wouldnt' be much savings, but I remember you saying a long time ago that ConstStrings are a huge source of memory usage in LLDB. So it seems like if we could ref-count when possible, it would be a major savings.
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
