>From my perspective: Do whatever makes y'all happy here :)
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 July 2016 at 00:42, Robinson, Paul <paul.robin...@sony.com> wrote: > > Daniel claimed it was not different, even though he proposed the text. > > I think it is better, as "egregious" (even though it is qualitative) > > helps identify what "rare" circumstances would come under the policy. > > As a non-lawyer I do think it's different. > > I personally agree with you, both on helping identify "rare" (as what, > not when), and for easing non-lawyers minds. > > cheers, > --renato >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
