Thanks, Chandler, for all your work on this. I’m glad to see this moving forward.
-Jim > On Jun 30, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > As mentioned some time ago[1], we’ve had a long (looooooong) series of > discussions about establishing a code-of-conduct for the LLVM project as a > whole over on the llvm-dev thread and the http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 > <http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741> code review. > > The discussion has largely died down for some time, and towards the end there > has been pretty wide support for the draft wording we have now. It isn’t > perfect, and there are still some important questions around forming the > advisory committee to handle reporting, but I think the wording is at a good > point of compromise in a challenging area. > > Based on the support, I’m going to land the patch that adds the draft. I’m > hoping this will immediately provide good advice and guidance, and I’m hoping > to see motion on setting up a reasonable advisory committee and resolving any > issues around reporting so we can make this an official part of the community. > > I sending this as a heads up so folks are aware, not to start a new > discussion thread. There are existing discussion threads[2] on llvm-dev if > folks want to join in active discussion or we can start fresh ones, but I > would encourage people to carefully read the discussion that has already > taken place to avoid revisiting areas that have already been heavily > discussed. > > Also, many thanks to the folks who provided all their opinions on the mailing > list threads and in person in long discussions about this topic. > > Thanks, > -Chandler > > [1]: Prior announcements: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045460.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045460.html> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2015-October/008530.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2015-October/008530.html> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/2015-October/000954.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/2015-October/000954.html> > > [2]: Existing threads: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099120.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099120.html> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151019/307070.html > <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151019/307070.html>_______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
