Oh yeah, that's fine. I won't take that code out. Hmm at least some of the builds went through this weekend, I made a number of changes Saturday morning (US Pacific time) that I saw go through the Ubuntu 14.04 cmake bot.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we've had an unrelated breaking change, so the buildbots were red over > the weekend. I've fixed it now, and it seems to be turning green. > We've also had power outage during the weekend and not all of the > buildbots are back up yet, as we need to wait for MTV to wake up. I'd > like to give this at least one more day, to give them a chance to > stabilize. Is this blocking you from making further changes to the > test event system? > > pl > > On 12 December 2015 at 00:20, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey Pavel and/or Tamas, > > > > Let me know when we're definitely all clear on the expected timeout > support > > I added to the (now once again) newer default test results. > > > > As soon as we don't need the legacy summary results anymore, I'm going to > > strip out the code that manages it. It is quite messy and duplicates the > > content that is better handled by the test event system. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Todd > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I went ahead and added the expected timeout support in r255363. > >> > >> I'm going to turn back on the new BasicResultsFormatter as the default. > >> We can flip this back off if it is still not doing everything we need, > but I > >> *think* we cover the issue you saw now. > >> > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Pavel, > >>> > >>> I'm going to adjust the new summary output for expected timeouts. I > hope > >>> to do that in the next hour or less. I'll put that in and flip the > default > >>> back on for using the new summary output. > >>> > >>> I'll do those two changes separately, so you can revert the flip back > on > >>> to flip it back off if we still have an issue. > >>> > >>> Sound good? > >>> > >>> (This can be orthogonal to the new work to mark up expected timeouts). > >>> -- > >>> -Todd > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> -Todd > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Todd > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
