Hey Pavel and/or Tamas, Let me know when we're definitely all clear on the expected timeout support I added to the (now once again) newer default test results.
As soon as we don't need the legacy summary results anymore, I'm going to strip out the code that manages it. It is quite messy and duplicates the content that is better handled by the test event system. Thanks! -Todd On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I went ahead and added the expected timeout support in r255363. > > I'm going to turn back on the new BasicResultsFormatter as the default. > We can flip this back off if it is still not doing everything we need, but > I *think* we cover the issue you saw now. > > -Todd > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Pavel, >> >> I'm going to adjust the new summary output for expected timeouts. I hope >> to do that in the next hour or less. I'll put that in and flip the default >> back on for using the new summary output. >> >> I'll do those two changes separately, so you can revert the flip back on >> to flip it back off if we still have an issue. >> >> Sound good? >> >> (This can be orthogonal to the new work to mark up expected timeouts). >> -- >> -Todd >> > > > > -- > -Todd > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
