Hey Sylvestre, On the Debian side, are we still counting on Makefile support for distribution building?
-Todd On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Bruce Mitchener <bruce.mitche...@gmail.com> wrote: > There were 2 changes made this week that broke both the cmake and one that > broke the Makefile builds. I checked in fixes for the cmake build, but no > one has done similar for the Makefile build (as far as I've noticed). > (Notably, there's no Makefile support for > source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang.) > > If we're going to leave that broken, maybe we could, instead, be the > pioneers in LLVM-land and remove the Makefile-based build system instead. > It doesn't seem like any of the people doing steady work on LLDB use it. > > - Bruce > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> We forced a clean build because it wasn’t picking up an enum change that >> affected the swig python bindings, and the objective c problem popped up. >> >> >> >> I’ve built with cmake on that machine, and it worked. I think the right >> answer is switch to cmake. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >> >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a >> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >> >> >> >> *From:* Zachary Turner [mailto:ztur...@google.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:42 PM >> *To:* Todd Fiala; Ted Woodward >> *Cc:* LLDB >> *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure >> on Linux? >> >> >> >> Can you change it to CMake instead of configure? I know that's not what >> you want to hear, but the configure build is on its way out, so you're >> going to have to do this at some point anyway. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:25 AM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I haven't seen that one myself. Are you still seeing it? >> >> >> >> Is it possible the buildbot's commands are possibly using older/stale >> object files? Is distcc/ccache involved? Does the build force a clean >> build? If not, does the issue go away on a clean build? Is it >> configure-based or cmake based? >> >> >> >> Just some thoughts. Good luck resolving! >> >> >> >> -Todd >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Our Ubuntu 14.10 buildbot at >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10 is failing, >> and I’ve been tasked to fix it because I’m the LLDB guy. >> >> >> >> It fails with things like: >> >> /var/lib/buildbot/slaves/hexagon-build-03/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10/llvm.obj/Release+Asserts/lib/libclangCodeGen.a(BackendUtil.o): >> In function `addObjCARCOptPass(llvm::PassManagerBuilder const&, >> llvm::legacy::PassManagerBase&)': >> >> BackendUtil.cpp:(.text._ZL17addObjCARCOptPassRKN4llvm18PassManagerBuilderERNS_6legacy15PassManagerBaseE+0x21): >> undefined reference to `llvm::createObjCARCOptPass()' >> >> >> >> I get the same error when I manually build using the same steps as the >> bot, but when I use cmake it works. >> >> >> >> Has anyone seen this behavior using configure? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >> >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a >> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -Todd >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >> > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
