There were 2 changes made this week that broke both the cmake and one that broke the Makefile builds. I checked in fixes for the cmake build, but no one has done similar for the Makefile build (as far as I've noticed). (Notably, there's no Makefile support for source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang.)
If we're going to leave that broken, maybe we could, instead, be the pioneers in LLVM-land and remove the Makefile-based build system instead. It doesn't seem like any of the people doing steady work on LLDB use it. - Bruce On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We forced a clean build because it wasn’t picking up an enum change that > affected the swig python bindings, and the objective c problem popped up. > > > > I’ve built with cmake on that machine, and it worked. I think the right > answer is switch to cmake. > > > > -- > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a > Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > > > > *From:* Zachary Turner [mailto:ztur...@google.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:42 PM > *To:* Todd Fiala; Ted Woodward > *Cc:* LLDB > *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure > on Linux? > > > > Can you change it to CMake instead of configure? I know that's not what > you want to hear, but the configure build is on its way out, so you're > going to have to do this at some point anyway. > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:25 AM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I haven't seen that one myself. Are you still seeing it? > > > > Is it possible the buildbot's commands are possibly using older/stale > object files? Is distcc/ccache involved? Does the build force a clean > build? If not, does the issue go away on a clean build? Is it > configure-based or cmake based? > > > > Just some thoughts. Good luck resolving! > > > > -Todd > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Our Ubuntu 14.10 buildbot at > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10 is failing, > and I’ve been tasked to fix it because I’m the LLDB guy. > > > > It fails with things like: > > /var/lib/buildbot/slaves/hexagon-build-03/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10/llvm.obj/Release+Asserts/lib/libclangCodeGen.a(BackendUtil.o): > In function `addObjCARCOptPass(llvm::PassManagerBuilder const&, > llvm::legacy::PassManagerBase&)': > > BackendUtil.cpp:(.text._ZL17addObjCARCOptPassRKN4llvm18PassManagerBuilderERNS_6legacy15PassManagerBaseE+0x21): > undefined reference to `llvm::createObjCARCOptPass()' > > > > I get the same error when I manually build using the same steps as the > bot, but when I use cmake it works. > > > > Has anyone seen this behavior using configure? > > > > -- > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a > Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > > > > -- > > -Todd > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
