YungRaj wrote:

> > > I was hoping to fix everything in one Pull Request so that it at least 
> > > becomes usable once this merges.
> > 
> > 
> > The LLVM project generally 
> > [prefers](https://llvm.org/docs/CodeReview.html#code-reviews-speed-and-reciprocity)
> >  smaller patches as they're easier to review. We'll definitely want to fix 
> > the end-to-end issue and have a test, but the deserialization issue can 
> > stand on its own and deserves its own PR.
> 
> Sounds good. Will divide the pull requests into many of them.
> 
> So I tried to get symbolicating backtraces working, however, this is a bit 
> more challenging, because LLDB doesn't have a good intuition of building a 
> `AddressRange` e.g. the start to finish of a function. It's not that I 
> couldn't get addresses to symbolicate, but many functions that get 
> symbolicated are actually from functions before it that had the subsequent 
> function unsymbolicated. Thus the symbols clash and the backtraces are low 
> accuracy.
> 
> @JDevlieghere do you believe there is a way to fix LLDB's intuition of the 
> proper bounds of functions based on function prologues (e.g. `BTI`, 
> `PACIBSP`, `STP X29, X30, [SP, #-offset]!` on arm64) and epilogues (`RET`, 
> `RETAB`, etc on arm64) ? Technically, decompilers are able to effectively 
> build this intuition, but the metadata for that doesn't get exported into the 
> linker map files. Is this non-trivial in general? Could lifting via IR be 
> effective here (even though I doubt the LLDB source supports that)?
> 
> If this is not achievable, what would it take to get type information 
> supported by `ObjectFileJSON`? This isn't a strict requirement of mine, but 
> it'd be a nice to reduce the quantity of things that I would need to do by 
> hand.

It looks like the best way to do this is force the decompiler to produce the 
end address in a symbol file. This is not supported by linker map files, but 
can be procured using a IDAPython script.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101062
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to