DavidSpickett wrote: > Thanks for the patches (if we end up going down this route you'll probably > want to split out the LLVM JIT changes into a separate PR).
I know little about the JIT side but this is my first reaction too. I wonder if that has its own tests that need adding, and it'll get more expert eyes on it. > without RISCV large code model, which has not been implemented yet I presume the work to do this is much greater than the work shown here? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99336 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
