jimingham wrote: > Also, something to keep in mind: If Dlang ever decides to change their > mangled name scheme in the future, this change may become wrong then. I'm not > sure what commitments the D language project has for their ABI stability > though.
That's why this shouldn't be in lldb in the long run, we should ask the D demangler in llvm (if we don't have a D demangler then we should just be ignoring D mangled symbols). We can't guarantee we'll grok anything newer than the D in your lldb, but that seems reasonable. But that way we wouldn't have to track this in lldb. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93881 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
