kastiglione wrote: > This a little bit raises the question why we don't do the same checks for > `_R` and `_Z`.
I asked myself the same. Turns out Rust doesn't have a number following the `_R` prefix, so it's not as simple. Given that C++ is much more load bearing, I didn't want to include changes that affect C++ in this diff. I don't want the Dlang functionality to be reverted if something goes wrong with an equivalent C++ change. > It would be even better if the various demanglers in llvm had a quick "could > this be mine" check so we didn't have to encode this in lldb. I agree. That can be a next step. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93881 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
