DavidSpickett wrote:

I realised that as it was, the calling object file would get its map updated 
but not the other object file. Which is potentially a regression if we choose 
to use one or the other file for a lookup. So now the methods update the member 
map, and return the changes they made to it, so the caller can do the same.

But now I've done that I'm wondering why this map doesn't live in the symbol 
table object itself, so I'm gonna try doing that.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91585
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to