Michael137 added a comment. In D135413#3846390 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135413#3846390>, @labath wrote:
>> There are longer-term plans of replacing the hand-rolled C++ parser with an >> alternative that uses the mangle tree API to do the parsing for us. > > You may be aware of this, but I feel I should mention that there are cases > when a function just does not have a mangled name, either because it is in an > `extern "C"` block, or because it was complied with > `--dwarf-linkage-names=Abstract` (default for `-gsce`). In this case, we > construct a fake demangled name from the DWARF debug info (the names of > enclosing (DW_TAG_)namespaces, and the types for (DW_TAG_)formal_parameters. > Of course, in this case, it makes even less sense to parse the resulting > string, since we're the ones who constructed it in the first place. However, > it may not be sufficient to assume that one can just start with a mangled > name, and get everything out that way. Good points, thanks! Didn't know about the `--dwarf-linkage-names=Abstract` option Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135413/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135413 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
