[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D131138: [lldb] Dynamically generate enum names in lldbutil

[Dave Lee via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

kastiglione added a comment.

I wonder how much breakage there would be if you implemented a bunch of the 
dunder methods. Ex:

  class StopReason:
      def __int__(self) -> int: ...
      def __eq__(self, other: StopReason | int) -> bool: ...
      # ...

This would cover many cases, but not all. For example `5 == 
StopReason.whatever` would fail, even when `StopReason.whatever == 5` passes.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D131138/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D131138

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits