jingham added a comment. In D131138#3698508 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131138#3698508>, @mib wrote:
> This is awesome 🤩 ! I was also thinking of changing the way enums are exposed > to python: instead of having everything added to the `lldb` python module, we > could create a class per enum and have static attributes for each enum value > so we could do something like `lldb.StopReason.Breakpoint`. That static > variable could be a pair with the value/string representation or maybe we > could use the `__str__` method to make it very pythonic. Just throwing some > ideas here for later, but this LGTM 😊 ! I'm not sure you could do this w/o breaking binary compatibility, since we pass these enums to a bunch of the SB API's. But if you can make that work, this would be nice. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131138/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131138 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
