clayborg added a comment. So it seems like we are catering to our code organization here instead of doing the right thing and relying on the host layer. I would rather move the log code into the host layer or make log handlers actual plug-ins so that we can do the right thing here.
If we can make LogHandler objects plug-ins, where each plug-in has a name, then this can be used to specify the different types of logs using "--kind <name>" or "--type <name>". Then we don't run into these layering issues, because essentially we have small LogHandler implementations here. Any objection to making LogHandler subclasses into actual plug-ins? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128321/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128321 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
