luismarques added a comment.

In D62732#2724040 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62732#2724040>, @JDevlieghere 
wrote:

> Any update on the testing strategy yet? It seems like that this is actively 
> being used and worked on, so I'm generally supportive of landing this with 
> some elementary coverage.

A while ago I got a skeleton of lldb-server compiling for RISC-V, but it seemed 
like it would be quite a bit of work to flesh out that implementation. I can 
only allocate some amount of effort to that right now, so that part might take 
a while to get finished.

I was going to follow up on @labath's suggestions of further testing just this 
patch (the ObjectFileELF and the disassembler changes), but some other work got 
in the way. That bit should be easier to prioritize, especially if we agreed 
that such kind of testing would be enough to get this landed.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62732/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62732

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to