justincohen added a comment. > OK we may need to retain the manual setting when I upstream this, instead of > going with the pure Process-maintained value determined dynamically by gdb > packet or corefile metadata. If this is something you need for your own > FixCodeAddress prelim patch, I can upstream the > target.process.virtual-addressable-bits setting (I think the name is fine, > even once Process can determine this dynamically). We'll need to decide at > some point what the correct behavior is when they conflict, but if only one > is set the choice is straightforward.
Were you able to confirm if sysctlbyname "machdep.virtual_address_size" works on iOS? I'm currently hard coding this information in minidump creation, as it's failing for me. I uploaded https://reviews.llvm.org/D98886 which reads a mask from a minidump and sets target.process.pointer-authentication-address-mask. Would you consider that (as I assume this is going to be converted into a mask regardless, and I if there's a possibility for future non-contiguous bits) What do you think? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98529/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98529 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
