DavidSpickett added a comment. > OK we may need to retain the manual setting when I upstream this, instead of > going with the pure Process-maintained value determined dynamically by gdb > packet or corefile metadata. If this is something you need for your own > FixCodeAddress prelim patch, I can upstream the > target.process.virtual-addressable-bits setting (I think the name is fine, > even once Process can determine this dynamically). We'll need to decide at > some point what the correct behavior is when they conflict, but if only one > is set the choice is straightforward.
From what pcc said, I was mistaken. So I don't think a setting would be needed (thanks for the offer though). The combination of top byte ignore and the PAC mask registers should give us what we need for Linux. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98529/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98529 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
