jasonmolenda added a comment. In D88387#2299413 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387#2299413>, @clayborg wrote:
> The other thing to think about is using minidump files instead of mach-o core > files. We have them in very good shape and they already have a built in > notion of "all image infos". Many more things in there too. Let me know if > you want to know more, but I'm not holding my breath! hhaha For a pure-lldb scenario (process save core; lldb -c) this would be pretty interesting. But it would be a trickier sell for other corefile creators on Darwin, and none of our other tooling would operate on them. Mach-O ride or die! :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
