labath added a comment. In D81001#2171999 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001#2171999>, @gedatsu217 wrote:
> > That said, are you sure this is the right sequence? \x1b[1Gl seems like it > > should print the l at column one, which does not sound right... > > I thought it did not add up too, but pexpect probably actually outputs these > characters. > > > The sequence I got in this test was l\x1b[2mp > > frame\x1b[0m\x1b[1G\r\x1b[9Cl, which seems more believable. > > It did not go well... However, `"l" + faint_color + "p frame" + reset + > "\x1b[1G" + "l"` passed the test. > This test ensure that the cursor is behind "l", but I do not understand what > role "\x1b[1G" plays... > > What do you think about this test? I think it won't pass on my machine because that's not the sequence I am getting. :( I can see how different libedit versions could produce different sequences, but I do not understand how can the one you're seeing be "right". Are you testing this on a mac? Lemme try what I get there... CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
