gedatsu217 added a comment. > That said, are you sure this is the right sequence? \x1b[1Gl seems like it > should print the l at column one, which does not sound right...
I thought it did not add up too, but pexpect probably actually outputs these characters. > The sequence I got in this test was l\x1b[2mp frame\x1b[0m\x1b[1G\r\x1b[9Cl, > which seems more believable. It did not go well... However, `"l" + faint_color + "p frame" + reset + "\x1b[1G" + "l"` passed the test. This test ensure that the cursor is behind "l", but I do not understand what role "\x1b[1G" plays... What do you think about this test? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
