clayborg added a comment.

In D72751#1880120 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72751#1880120>, @labath wrote:

> I think we should just have DynamicLoaderStatic disqualify itself for wasm 
> files -- using it will never work there, so why should it pretend to support 
> them...


The triple clearly has an environment set of "wasm" so it should be easy to 
detect this in the DynamicLoaderStatic and stop it from saying it can handle 
it. The main issue then is do we have DynamicLoaderStatic say it can't handle 
anything if any environment is set, or just not for "wasm" (if OS and vendor 
are not set either).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72751/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72751



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to