labath added a comment. In D73279#1851068 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73279#1851068>, @jankratochvil wrote:
> But then maybe it also needs: > > # Our current version of gtest does not properly recognize C++11 support > # with MSVC, so it falls back to tr1 / experimental classes. Since LLVM > # itself requires C++11, we can safely force it on unconditionally so that > # we don't have to fight with the buggy gtest check. > add_definitions(-DGTEST_LANG_CXX11=1) > add_definitions(-DGTEST_HAS_TR1_TUPLE=0) > > > as being used in such cases in cmakefiles in llvm/ but on Linux I do not see > if it is really needed here or not. That might explain the warnings I have seen when building with msvc the other day. It might good to add those too. ================ Comment at: lldb/unittests/TestingSupport/CMakeLists.txt:4 MockTildeExpressionResolver.cpp + Symbol/YAMLModuleTester.cpp TestUtilities.cpp ---------------- The idea was then that this would be a separate library (`lldbSymbolHelpers`) with its own CMakeLists.txt and everything. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73279/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73279 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits