labath added a comment.

In D70840#1845176 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70840#1845176>, @clayborg wrote:

> Speaking to having the LLVM layer strip things out, this should be an option 
> if it does get added there. If we have a stripped binary and we have no 
> symbols or any other CPU map, and DWARF is the only way to tell if a function 
> was ARM or Thumb by looking at bit zero, then we need to somehow be able to 
> get this raw information.


I would expect there will still be some way to get the raw data, because the 
dumping tools would want to get it.

However, if I understand things correctly, this is would not be a very useful 
source of information for us -- on windows arm, all debug info addresses will 
have the thumb bit set (because everything is thumb), and everywhere else the 
debug info will have the bit 0 cleared, regardless of whether the function is 
thumb or not...


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70840/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70840



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to