jingham added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/dotest.py:787
+def disabledynamics():
+ setSetting('target.prefer-dynamic-value', 'no-dynamic-values')
----------------
labath wrote:
> Maybe you could even put this as the default value for the `settings`
> variable?
Not sure what you meant by this, but I don't think "no dynamic values" is the
right setting for prefer-dynamic-value for ordinary users of lldb. For ObjC it
is definitely the wrong value (too many things get passed as "id" which is not
useful). But also, every time we break dynamic value determination for C++
we get lots of complaints, so I think this is a feature people really rely on.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72662/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72662
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
