JDevlieghere added a comment. In D71105#1774936 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71105#1774936>, @labath wrote:
> This looks better. Ideally I wouldn't even have Utility/GDBRemote.h, but as > Process/gdb-remote is not a very good place for it either (it messes with > lldb-server dependencies), we can live with it for now. Yeah, the other problem is the command object which needs to be able to deserialize the packets to dump them. Layering is hard :( CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71105/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71105 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
