jankratochvil added a comment. @omjavaid I do not have the regression reproducible, could you provide more info? Having on both hosts trunk `54a9b4c02ff57e9847e0c501578e51db6f73d3be` having applied your D69904 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69904>, having reverted your revert (=reapplied) of this my D63540 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540>. Running on Fedora 30 `armv7l`:
ssh -L 1234:localhost:1234 -L 1235:localhost:1235 arm03-packager00.cloud.fedoraproject.org ~/redhat/llvm-monorepo-clangassert/bin/lldb-server platform --listen "*:1234" --server --min-gdbserver-port 1235 --max-gdbserver-port 1236 On Fedora 30 x86_64: ./bin/lldb-dotest --arch=arm --platform-name=remote-linux --platform-url=connect://localhost:1234 -f TestSourceInfo -v -t UNSUPPORTED: LLDB (/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo-clangassert/bin/clang-10-arm) :: test_dsym (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestSourceInfo) (test case does not fall in any category of interest for this run) PASS: LLDB (/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo-clangassert/bin/clang-10-arm) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestSourceInfo) PASS: LLDB (/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo-clangassert/bin/clang-10-arm) :: test_dwo (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestSourceInfo) UNSUPPORTED: LLDB (/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo-clangassert/bin/clang-10-arm) :: test_gmodules (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestSourceInfo) (test case does not fall in any category of interest for this run) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 4 tests in 0.802s RESULT: PASSED (2 passes, 0 failures, 0 errors, 2 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 unexpected successes) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
