JosephTremoulet marked 2 inline comments as done.
JosephTremoulet added a comment.

In D68096#1687790 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68096#1687790>, @labath wrote:

> It doesn't look like it should be too hard to add yaml support for the 
> exceptions stream -- it should only be a matter of adapting the patterns 
> already used for other stream to work for this particular case. Could you 
> give a go at that?


Yes, will do, thanks for the pointers.



================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/minidump/ProcessMinidump.cpp:258-265
+    uint32_t signo = m_active_exception->exception_record.exception_code;
+
+    if (signo == 0) {
+      // Artifically inject a SIGSTOP so that we'll find a stop reason
+      // when we process the stop event.
+      signo = GetUnixSignals()->GetSignalNumberFromName("SIGSTOP");
+    }
----------------
labath wrote:
> After some investigation, I re-learned about the DumpRequested constant, 
> which is already checked for in this code (and it is tested 
> (TestMiniDumpNew.py:test_snapshow_minidump) and works/does not hang). It 
> seems to me like it would make sense to treat this case the same way as 
> DumpRequested, and just don't return any stop info (instead of returning a 
> stop info with signal 0 or SIGSTOP). IOW, you would just put `if (signo==0) 
> return;` here. Eventually we could apply the same change to process elf core 
> as well..
> 
> WDYT?
SGTM, and seems to work for my use case.  I wasn't sure though whether to leave 
the `if (signo==0) return` under `if (arch.GetTripe().getOS() == 
llvm::Triple::Linux)`.  Originally I'd put logic here just because I was 
copying logic from Process**Elf**Core.  It looks like the Apple case here would 
maybe similarly have an issue with exception code zero (?), but the `else` case 
(Windows?) doesn't reference the exception_code at all so I'd hesitate to apply 
this change there... I've left it under the check for Linux, but happy to move 
it if that seems wrong.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68096/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68096



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to